4.9 · 462 Google reviews · Licensed & Insured
Florida Statute 163.045: Removing a Dangerous Tree Without a Permit
Florida law lets a homeowner remove a dangerous tree without local approval - if a certified arborist documents the risk. Here is how.
“Happy trees did an amazing job cutting my trees and providing information. Steve was really nice and knowledgeable. Great communication and pricing. Definitely will be using their service again!!”
- 462 Google reviews
- Licensed & Insured
- ISA Certified Arborist on staff
- Pinellas since 1989
There is exactly one route in Florida law that lets a homeowner take down a tree without asking the city or the county first. It is section 163.045 of the Florida Statutes, it is narrow, and almost everything said about it online is out of date.
It matters more in Pinellas County than almost anywhere else. Pinellas rewrote its entire tree code effective 23 January 2026, Chapter 58, Article XIX, sections 58-807 through 58-814, created by Ordinance No. 26-3 adopted 1-20-2026, and that new article contains no exemptions section at all. No dangerous-tree exemption. No dead-tree exemption. No storm exemption. A dead tree is simply a "Grade 0" tree under Table 58-813(a), which may be removed with an approved permit and without replanting. On the face of the codes cited across these pages, § 163.045 is the only path that removes the permit requirement outright.
What the statute actually says
Current text, F.S. § 163.045(2):
A local government may not require a notice, application, approval, permit, fee, or mitigation for the pruning, trimming, or removal of a tree on a residential property if the property owner possesses documentation from an arborist certified by the ISA or a Florida licensed landscape architect that the tree poses an unacceptable risk to persons or property. A tree poses an unacceptable risk if removal is the only means of practically mitigating its risk below moderate, as determined by the tree risk assessment procedures outlined in Best Management Practices - Tree Risk Assessment, Second Edition (2017).
Subsection (3) adds that the local government may not require replanting. Subsection (4) says the section does not reach delegated mangrove authority under ss. 403.9321–403.9333.
Four conditions, all of which must be true
1. The property must be "residential property" as the statute defines it, § 163.045(1)(b): a single-family, detached building, on a lot actively used for single-family residential purposes, that is a conforming or legally recognized nonconforming use. Duplexes, townhomes, condominiums, apartments, commercial and industrial property, vacant lots and HOA common areas are all outside the definition.
2. The assessor must hold one of exactly two credentials, an arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, or a Florida licensed landscape architect. Nothing else counts.
3. The document must be a real, signed, on-site assessment performed in accordance with ISA Best Management Practices – Tree Risk Assessment, Second Edition (2017). Not a photo review. Not a desk opinion. Signed by the person who did it.
4. The conclusion must clear the statutory bar, that removal is the only means of practically mitigating the tree’s risk below moderate. If pruning, cabling, bracing or moving the target underneath it would get risk below moderate, the statute does not authorize removal.
The 2022 amendment is the part nearly everyone gets wrong
The original 2019 law (ch. 2019-155) required only documentation that a tree "presents a danger to persons or property." That was loose, and it is the version still quoted on some city web pages in this county, Seminole’s published HB 1159 notice and the first paragraph of Tarpon Springs' tree page both reproduce the superseded 2019 wording.
Chapter 2022-121 replaced it. Since then the assessment must be performed to the ISA Tree Risk Assessment BMP, 2nd Edition, the methodology behind the ISA TRAQ qualification, and must conclude unacceptable risk as the statute defines it. ISA TRAQ is a distinct credential from ISA Certified Arborist. Before anyone signs a § 163.045 letter for you, ask what qualification they hold and make sure the report names the methodology it was performed under. A generic "this tree is a hazard" letter does not satisfy the current statute.
Start here
Send us a photo of the tree.
You do not have to know whether it needs to come down. That is the part we are for.
- One photo, whole tree in frameTrunk base to top. A close-up of anything that looks wrong helps.
- Text us the photoThe text button below opens the right thread. Add your street and city.
- We come out and lookEvery estimate is in person, free, sometimes the answer is that it needs nothing.
What the statute does not do
- It does not override mangrove regulation, subsection (4) is explicit, and Pinellas County holds delegated authority under Chapter 58, Article XVI.
- It does not reach trees in the public right-of-way. Pinellas County § 58-809: "No trees shall be removed from county-maintained right-of-way without an approved permit."
- It does not exempt the work from contractor licensing, insurance, or any other permit.
- It does not cover a tree that is merely messy, leaf-dropping, root-lifting a sidewalk or blocking a view. The below-moderate test is the whole gate.
- No Florida court decision, Attorney General opinion or agency declaratory statement interpreting § 163.045. Nothing on this page should be read as a prediction of how a court would rule.
Who in Pinellas County acknowledges it
| Jurisdiction | What it publishes |
|---|---|
| St. Petersburg | The most detailed policy in the county, on its Urban Forestry page, and it states it will report an arborist or landscape architect to the ISA or DBPR for documentation misuse |
| Oldsmar | Names the statute on the tree removal application itself, as an upload field "in lieu of obtaining City permit" |
| Seminole | A formal notice PDF, but it quotes the superseded 2019 text, and it carves seven named subdivisions back out |
| Tarpon Springs | A website page; the City also offers its own $50 ISA arborist inspection for residents |
| Safety Harbor | Its permit form says twice that the form does not constitute § 163.045 "documentation" |
| Pinellas County, Clearwater, Largo, Dunedin, Pinellas Park, Belleair, Gulfport | We found no published acknowledgment. The statute binds them as a matter of law regardless, but none of them has built a lane for it |
Frequently asked questions
If I have the letter, do I still have to tell the city? The statute says the exemption applies "if the property owner possesses documentation." Its plain text does not condition the exemption on filing anything first. In practice St. Petersburg asks residents to email documentation to trees@stpete.org so the removal can be tracked, and we would keep the signed, dated report on hand before the saw starts either way.
My tree is dead. Isn’t that automatically covered? No. Dead is not the statutory test, unacceptable risk is, and it is a technical determination. Some jurisdictions handle dead trees more easily under their own code than under the statute: Clearwater’s definition of "protected tree" excludes hazardous trees, which expressly include dead, diseased, broken, split, cracked, leaning and uprooted trees, and Safety Harbor excludes a "Dead Tree" from protection and offers a free City Arborist inspection to confirm it. In unincorporated Pinellas County, by contrast, a dead tree still needs an approved permit.
Does 163.045 cover my palms? Unclear, and we are not going to guess. The statute does not define "tree." Tarpon Springs protects Cabbage and Sabal Palms at any size and its § 163.045 guidance does not address palms, The published code does not confirm whether the exemption reaches them. Ask the city before relying on it.
What happens if the documentation does not hold up? In unincorporated Pinellas County the penalty for an unauthorized removal is $150 per DBH inch (§ 58-810(c)), a 30-inch oak is $4,500, and § 58-810(b) makes liability joint and several across everyone who caused or contributed to the violation, including the contractor, and it follows people who no longer own the property.
Verified against F.S. § 163.045 (2025 compiled edition, flsenate.gov) and Pinellas County Code Ch. 58, Art. XIX as of July 2026. Ordinances change, if a detail matters to your decision, confirm the current text with the city first.
Next step
If a tree on your property worries you, the first question is not which statute applies, it is whether the tree actually has to come down. Have it looked at. Call (727) 365-1803 for a free estimate, and see the Pinellas County permit hub for the rules where you live, tree risk assessment for how a tree gets evaluated, and hazardous tree removal if it is already failing.
Google reviews
Rated 4.9 by 462 of your neighbors.
Reviews · Florida Statute 163.045: Removing a Dangerous Tree Without a Permit
4.9
462 reviews on Google, the count on our public Google listing
“We were looking for a tree service with a certified arborist. We got just what we needed with Happy Tree Service. Steve gave an estimate and knowledgeable advice. They arrived on time did an excellent job and cleaned up all debris. We recommend them and will use them again.”
“Happy trees did an amazing job cutting my trees and providing information. Steve was really nice and knowledgeable. Great communication and pricing. Definitely will be using their service again!!”
Every one of these lives on our public Google listing, where we cannot edit or delete a word. Read them all on Google →